The Wild West of Measuring Corporate Sustainability
It’s a confusing time for measuring corporate social and environmental impact, but the pioneers who take it seriously, set ambitious goals, and report accurately will come out ahead.
It’s a confusing time for measuring corporate social and environmental impact, but the pioneers who take it seriously, set ambitious goals, and report accurately will come out ahead.
The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and Stanford Social Innovation Review have partnered to publish a 15-part series of articles exploring whether and how philanthropy and nonprofits can improve US voter turnout and civic participation.
Let’s be ambitious about using innovative financing to help sort out global supply chains, provide catalytic capital for energy transition, and link talent in emerging markets to online marketplaces.
Welfare reform to encourage work doesn’t take into account how unstable jobs have become, especially for the poorest.
Solving the problem means taking an inclusive approach to foster sustainable development in the countries of origin.
Why the social sector should worry more about words.
Business has an important role to play in social change, but not through corporate social responsibility.
If government is going to champion outcomes-based policies, let’s learn from our mistakes.
The tide that has swept experimental program evaluation to the forefront of knowledge building about social policy is suddenly ebbing.
Strategy, capital, and people are essential to scaling an organization’s work and impact, but they’re not sufficient—to transform those crucial resources into the desired results, nonprofit leaders need to redesign their organizations too.